Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04433 12
Original file (04433 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JET
Docket No. 4433-12

26 Nov 12

 

our application for corr
of 10 USC 1552.

This is in reference to y ection of your

naval record pursuant to the provisions

£ the Board for Correction of Naval

cutive session, considered your
Your allegations of error and

h administrative

BR three-member panel o
Records, sitting in exe
application on 26 November 2012.

injustice were reviewed in accordance wit
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this

Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,

ici In addition, the Bo

advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560

of which is attached.

ul and conscientious consideration of the entire

found that the evidence submitted was
blish the existence of probable material

error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially

concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
lication has been denied. The names and

s of the members of the panel will be furnished upon

after caref
record, the Board
insufficient to esta

appearance; however,
adequately documented and that a person
materially add to the Board's understanding of the issues

involved. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been

denied.

al appearance would not
It is regretted that
that favorable actio
the Board reconsider i
material evidence or othe
the Board. In this regard,
a presumption of i
Consequently, whe

naval record, the
existence of probable m

n cannot be taken. You ar

n applying for 4
burden is on th
aterial error or ay

Sincerely,
DA il . CASH

Hea y Section

Acting

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09593-02

    Original file (09593-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00705-03

    Original file (00705-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00761-03

    Original file (00761-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In his petition, action that would allow paym CF Program quests favorable EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00529-03

    Original file (00529-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. In his petition, Petty Officer was told at the Charlotte MEPS that he was not el He requests favorable action that will allow payment of an EB. Every recruit is not offc~ed n"l- r ~ c e i i r e ~ an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01431-02

    Original file (01431-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals reviewed Mr. -petition for a Purple Heart.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07599-01

    Original file (07599-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material subniitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The following is provided in response to reference (a): b. J s case has been reviewed.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05982-01

    Original file (05982-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20370-5000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 02U0023 23 Jan 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05982-01 with microfiche service record petition. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02761-03

    Original file (02761-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 28 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01420-03

    Original file (01420-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03110236 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS E CASE OF I Encl:...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06013-01

    Original file (06013-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all ~naterial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 02110047 31 Jan 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj:...